http://femalemuscle.com/contests-coverage-2/2008-new-york-pro-figure/ established by lori victoria braun in 1995 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:56:05 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://femalemuscle.com/contests-coverage-2/2008-new-york-pro-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-10499 mike Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:07:18 +0000 http://www.femalemuscle.com/contests-coverage-2/2008-new-york-pro-figure/#comment-10499 i have to agree with the barbie doll reference. it always was a roll model for girls. some girls take it seriously. i have to agree with the barbie doll reference. it always was a roll model for girls. some girls take it seriously.

]]> http://femalemuscle.com/contests-coverage-2/2008-new-york-pro-figure/comment-page-1/#comment-10491 Tanuki Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:49:14 +0000 http://www.femalemuscle.com/contests-coverage-2/2008-new-york-pro-figure/#comment-10491 Not to be rude, but when I first saw this pic I thought it was a new 'sporty' Barbie doll or something. Her arms look to be permanently positioned (though I'm sure they must turn at the shoulders). I mean, don't get me wrong, as a kid I would have stashed THIS version of Barbie under my mattress, never mind the potential ridicule. Not to be rude, but when I first saw this pic I thought it was a new ’sporty’ Barbie doll or something. Her arms look to be permanently positioned (though I’m sure they must turn at the shoulders). I mean, don’t get me wrong, as a kid I would have stashed THIS version of Barbie under my mattress, never mind the potential ridicule.

]]>